Ramarathinammal v. Tahsildar Cum Record Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.09.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.33723 of 2002

1. Ramarathinammal

2. S.R.Ravindran

3. R.Sathi Narendiran,

4. Jayasingh

5. P.G.Venkatesan,

6. C.Murugesan

...Petitioners

Vs.

1. Tahsildar cum Record Officer, Pennagaram, Dharmapuri District,

2. P.V.Venkatachalam

...Respondents

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in its proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No.3829 of 2000 (A2) dated 25.10.2000 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi,AGP for R.1 Mr.V.R.Anna Gandhi for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates for R.2

O R D E R

When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for petitioners. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the 1st respondent submitted that the petitioners are no more and legal heirs of the petitioners have been settled.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Recording the statement made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the 1st respondent, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(J) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar usk To Tahsildar cum Record Officer, Pennagaram, Dharmapuri District.

1 CC to the Government Pleader, SR.No. 52175 W.P.No.33723 of 2002 EV (CO) PSI (07.10.2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/