P.Rengasamy, Manager v. The General Manager(Tnkz)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :23.01.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P.Nos.36115 & 36116 of 2017 P.Rengasamy ... Petitioner Vs 1.The General Manager (TNKZ) and Appellate Authority, Bank of Baroda, Zonal Office (TN & KL Zone), Baroda Pride, New No.141, 3 rd Floor, LUZ Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

2.The Deputy General Manager (TNKZ), and Disciplinary Authority, Bank of Baroda, Zonal Office (TN & KL Zone), Baroda Pride, New No.141, 3 rd Floor, LUZ Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondents herein namely the Union of India, Page No: 1/4

represented by the Deputy General Manager, TNKZ & Disciplinary Authority and Bank of Baroda, Zonal Office, (TN & KZ) Baroda Pride, New No.41, 3rd floor, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004 bearing impugned proceedings No.TNKZ: VIG:F 406: 03: 759, dated 25.11.2014 quash the same as non-est in the eye of law and also the order bearing No.CHNA: VIG: F406:06/ 575, dated 21.08.2017 issued by the 2nd respondent herein viz., Dy. General Manager (DZH-CHMZ) & Disciplinary Authority dated 21.08.2017 Bank of Baroda, Zonal Office (TN & KL Zone) New No.41, 3rd floor, West Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 4, quash the same as non-est in the eye of law and consequenlty direct the respondents herein to reinstate the petitioner in to service as Branch Manager in any one of the respondent's Bank Branch with continuity of service from the date of order of suspension of 25.11.2014 with full pay and allowance together with attendant, service and monetary benefits, within a time frame that may be stipulate by this Court and pass such further order.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Govindaprasad For Respondents : Mr.Anandakrishnan

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for the hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in view of the subsequent Page No: 2/4

developments happened during the pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Writ Petition and requested to close this Writ petition as infructuous.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 23.01.2024 gba Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No Page No: 3/4

BATTU DEVANAND ,J.

gba and W.M.P.Nos.36115 & 36116 of 2017 23.01.2024 Page No: 4/4