R.Kalyana Sundaram v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03-09-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1.R.Kalyana Sundaram, S/o. Late Rathinasamy Nadar, No.3/215, Pandian Salai, Nilangarai Village, Chennai-600 115.
2.K.Chandra, W/o. Thiru, R. Kalyana Sundaram, No.3/215, Pandian Salai, Nilangarai Village, Chennai-600 115.
Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The District Collector Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.
2.The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sholinganallur Division, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600 119.
4.The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600 119.
Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th Respondent to dispose of the representation submitted by way of application dated 20.06.2025 by on-line bearing Acknowledgment No.2025/0105/02/321264 submitted in respect of issue of patta for the land and building bearing No.3/215, Pandian Salai, Nilangarai, Chennai, 600 115 admeasuring an extent of 2 Grounds, comprised in Survey Nos. 57/2B (part) and 57/1 Nilangarai Village, Sholinganallur taluk, Chennai District within a time frame. For Petitioner(s):
Mr.L.Dhamodharan For Respondent(s):
Mrs.S.Indhubala, Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the 4 th respondent to consider the petitioners' representation dated 20.06.2025, whereby, he sought for issuance of patta.
2.Mrs.S.Indhubala, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 4.The grievance of the petitioners before this Court is that the representation of the petitioners dated 20.06.2025 has not been considered by the 4 th respondent so far.
5.This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioners, as it is for the 4 th respondent to consider and decide the same on merits and in accordance with law. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, only by directing the 4 th respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 20.06.2025 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law. Such exercise shall be done by the 4 th
respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
03-09-2025 (1⁄2) rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes
To 1.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.
2.The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sholinganallur Division, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600 119.
4.The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600 119.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.
rst 03-09-2025 (1⁄2)