← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/28923/2022granted

Bulu Maharana v. State Rep By

2022-12-06Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

Crl.O.P.No.28923 of 2022 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379, 430 of IPC and Sec 21(1) of Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, in Crime No.821 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along other accused persons have stolen 1⁄2 unit of sand from the ground near Athur. Hence, the complaint was registered.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners, on their own volition, are ready and willing to contribute a some amount to any charitable trust as imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioners along other accused persons Page No.1/4

have stolen 1⁄2 unit of sand from the ground near Athur. He further submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioners. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Ponneri, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the Karthika Public Educational and Page No.2/4

Charitable Trust, Mayiladuthurai, SB A/C No.497663303 Indian Bank Branch Code :00165 IFSC Code : IDIB000M023, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

[b] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioners are directed to report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. Page No.3/4

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

msrm [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

06.12.2022 msrm Crl.O.P.No.28923 of 2022 Page No.4/4