K.Munusami v. The Superintendent Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.12.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN Crl.O.P.No.30004 of 2022 K.Munisami ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, District Superintendent of Police Office, Ranipet District.

(Crime No. not known of 2022) 2.State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Arakkonam Taluk Police Station, Arakkonam, Ranipet District 631 001.

... Respondents PRAYER : This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents police not to harass the petitioner in Crime No. Not known of 2022 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.A.L.Nagarajan for Mr.A.Gopinath For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate(Crl.side) 1/6

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents police not to harass the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that under the pretext of enquiry, the respondents police are unnecessarily harassing the petitioner.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents police submitted that on receiving the complaint from the defacto complainant with regard to fabrication of documents, enquiry has been conducted and the same is pending for further investigation since the petitioner has not cooperated for enquiry.

4.

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police. 2/6

5.

It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent police has been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. 6.

In the present case in hand, the petitioner has complained of harassment by the police based on a complaint and seek for this Court's intervention by way of a direction. The term 'harassment' by itself has a very wide meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitioner may not be the same to the police officer.

7.

In order to circumvent such situations, the following guidelines are issued:

a)While summoning any person named in the complaint or any witness to the incident complained of, the police officer shall summon such person through a written summon under Section 160 Cr.P.C., specifying a particular date and time for appearing before them for such an enquiry/investigation. 3/6

b) The respondent police is directed to serve summons mentioning the CSR number, date of complaint and the name of the complainant c)The minutes of the enquiry shall be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station. d)The police officer shall refrain himself or herself from harassing persons called upon for enquiry/investigation. e)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhered to. 8.

With the above observations and direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

06.12.2022 Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order shk 4/6

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, District Superintendent of Police Office, Ranipet District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Arakkonam Taluk Police Station, Arakkonam, Ranipet District 631 001.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

5/6

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.

shk Crl.O.P.No.30004 of 2022 06.12.2022 6/6