Mangalam Valley Owners v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR AND W.M.P.No.30344 of 2023 Mangalam Valley Owners Association (MVOA) Rep. by its President Kavi Venkatesan Mangalam Valley Andhivadi Village HCF Post, Hosur Taluk Krishnagiri ..

Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner Hosur Corporation Hosur 2.Manjunatha Swamy .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of a writ of certiorari calling for records on the file of the 1st respondent in proceedings Na.Ka.8251/2023/F1 dated 23.08.2023 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction. 1/4

For petitioner : Ms.R.Poornima For R1 : Mr.T.Balaji Standing Counsel R2 : Tapal returned as insufficient address

O R D E R

(made by M.SUNDAR, J.) In and vide the 'proceedings of R1 in Na.Ka.8251/2023/F1 dated 23.08.2023' (hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of convenience and clarity), R1 (Commissioner, Hosur Corporation) has directed removal of a compound wall on the ground that it is an encroachment qua 25 feet road in a layout.

2. Ms.R.Poornima, learned counsel for writ petitioner and Mr.T.Balaji, learned Standing Counsel for R1, are before us.

3. Both learned counsel submit in one voice that the wall which is the subject matter of the impugned order of R1 has since been removed and it will suffice that this stated position is recorded to give a closure to the captioned main 'writ petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity]. 2/4

4. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned main WP and WMP thereat are disposed of as closed, recording the stated position of learned counsel for writ petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for R1. There shall be no order as to costs.

(M.S., J.) (H.C., J.) 15.07.2025 Index : Yes/No gya To The Commissioner Hosur Corporation Hosur 3/4

M.SUNDAR, J.

AND HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.

gya 15.07.2025 4/4