← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/30469/2022dismissed

Sarath @ Sarathkumar v. The State Rep By Its,

2023-01-04Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.07.2022 for the alleged offence under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(II)(A), and 22(c) of NDPS Act in Crime No.143 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 06.07.2022, at about 20.00 hrs., on a secret information, when the respondent police conducted a check-up at Kasimedu Power Kuppam subway, the petitioner along with other accused found standing suspiciously and on search, they were found in possession of 8 nos. of LSD stamps (totally weighing 130 mg.) and seized the same. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this is the second petition seeking for bail and he is an innocent person. He would submit that he has not at all committed any offence as alleged by the respondent police and he will abide any condition that may be imposed by

this court. He would further submit that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration from 06.07.2022. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for respondent would submit that he is the prime accused and he is having 6 previous cases including Sec.302 I.P.C. cases pending against him and he is a notorious person. He would submit that the contraband seized from him is a commercial quantity. He would submit that now the investigation is not yet completed and if he is released on bail, he would tamper the witnesses and hamper the investigation. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by both counsel and also considering gravity of offence committed by the petitioner on recovery of 8 nos. of LSD Stamps (totally weighing 130 mg.), which is a commercial quantity and there are 6 previous cases including Sec.302 I.P.C. cases pending against him and the investigation is not yet completed and also considering the fact that if he is

released on bail, there is possibility of tampering the witnesses and hampering the investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 04.01.2023 rpp

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

rpp 04.01.2023