← Library
Madras High CourtWP/34123/2003dismissed as infructuous

C.Perpetual Daisy Rani v. The State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep

2017-09-19Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.09.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Writ Petition No.34123 of 2003 C.Perpetual Daisy Rani .. Petitioner /versus/ 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

3.The District Educational Officer, Kanyakumari District Thuckalay - 629 175.

4.The Correspondent, St.Mary's Higher Secondary School, Colachal - 629 251, Kanyakumari District.

..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned G.O.Ms.No.155 (School Education) dated 03.10.2002 and the consequent proceedings of the DEO in Na.Ka.No.1530/A2/03 dated 03.10.2003 and quash the same in so far as they seek to stop the petitioner's salary and further direct the respondents herein to continue to pay her the salary as paid since her appointment on 24.06.1996.

For Petitioner :M/s.P.Godson Swaminath For Respondents:Mr.R.Govindasamy Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned G.O.Ms.No.155(School Education) dated 03.10.2002 and the consequent proceedings of the DEO in Na.Ka.No.1530/A2/03 dated 03.10.2003 and quash the same in so https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

far as they seek to stop the petitioner's salary and further direct the respondents herein to continue to pay her the salary as paid since her appointment on 24.06.1996.

2. I heard M/s.P.Godson Swaminath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Govindasamy, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents R1 to R3.

3. It is reported by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that there is no instructions from his client namely, the writ petitioner. Hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as no instructions.

4. It is seen from the records that the writ petition is of the year 2003 and the same is pending for the past 14 years. Apart from that, there is no instructions from the writ petitioner.

5. In view of the above, the writ petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ub To 1.The Secretary to Government, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

3.The District Educational Officer, Kanyakumari District Thuckalay - 629 175.

4.The Correspondent, St.Mary's Higher Secondary School, Colachal - 629 251, Kanyakumari District.

+ 1 cc to the Government Pleader Sr.68860 + 1 cc to M/s. Isaac Chambers Writ Petition No.34123 of 2003 PA(CO) EU(26/10/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/