Ganesa Kumari v. Secretary To Govt Of Tamil

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 29.06.2017 Coram :

The Honourable Mr.Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P. No.33787 of 2002 Ganesa Kumari

...Petitioner

Vs

1. Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Education Department, Fort St George, Chennai - 9.

2. The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai - 6.

...Respondents

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to implement the orders of this Hon'ble Court in a batch of writ petition no.221/91 etc dated 30.07.1999 including W.P.No.8521/91 dated 29.9.1999 by issuing necessary orders as far as the petitioner is concerned. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Balaji.

For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijaya Kumar, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The prayer sought for in this writ petition is to implement the order of the Hon'ble High Court in a batch of writ petitions No.221/91 etc., dated 30.07.1999 including W.P.No.8521/91 dated 29.9.1999.

2. The prayer sought for as such cannot be considered by this Court, in view of the fact that orders in this batch of writ petitions were issued on 30.07.1999 and to implement the order of this Court, the writ petitioner cannot file another https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

writ petition. In the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court dated 30.07.1999, the Government order itself was quashed and it is for the writ petitioner to submit proper representation to the competent authorities narrating the facts regarding the quashing of the Government order by the Hon'ble High Court. Contrarily the writ petitioner has chosen to file the present writ petition.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents contended that the writ petition was allowed long back and the Government has implemented the order of this Court and in this circumstances, the ground raised in this writ petition cannot be considered at this length of time and if any grievances still exist, it is open to the writ petitioner to file a fresh representation to the authorities concerned in order to redress his grievances.

With these observations, the writ petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sli/jer To

1. Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Education Department, Fort St George, Chennai - 9.

2. The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai - 6.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.45744 W.P. No.33787 of 2002 AR(CS V) CU(11/07/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/