Nemili Police Station v. Panchatcharam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY (C.C.No.73 of 2024 of Judicial Magistrate No.2 Court, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet) State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Nemili Police Station, Vellore district.

... Petitioner Vs.

Panchatcharam .... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Government Advocate

ORDER

This case in Cr.No.200 of 2017 is registered for alleged offence under Sections 279 and 304(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties have moved on and have no objection to the case being disposed of on compromise. The accused has paid a total sum of Rs.2.5 lakhs as compensation to the de facto complainant. The de facto complainant also admits the same. Due to the unique manner in which this designated bench conducts hybrid hearings, the filing of written affidavits or terms of compromise is dispensed with. Page No.1 of 3

2. Considering the factual matrix, the context in which the conflict arose, the background of the parties, and their present position, this is an appropriate case for the exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as per Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr., [(2012) 10 SCC 303].

3. Accordingly, the case in C.C.No.73 of 2024 of Judicial Magistrate No.2 Court, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet, stands quashed. This Suo Motu Transfer Case is disposed of.

25.08.2025 grs electronically alone. The Trial Court shall take note of the order and accordingly classify the case pending before them as allowed / dismissed / disposed of, etc, and while doing so, consider any applications such as disposal of properties, etc., and pass appropriate orders, as may be necessary. Further, the Court below is directed to dispatch the copy of this order to all concerned. Page No.2 of 3

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

grs 25.08.2025 Page No.3 of 3