← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/4567/2024dismissed

Lalithas Hotel v. N. Pushparaj

2024-11-22Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar4 pages

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date : 22.11.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR C.R.P.[NPD].No.4567 of 2024 & CMP.No.25424 of 2024

1. M/s.Lalithas Hotel Proprietor Ragupathy, A-15, Mettupalayam Main Road, Coimbatore - 641 020.

2. M.Ragupathy . . . Petitioners

Versus

N.Pushparaj . . . Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the fair and final order dated 09.07.2024 passed in R.T.A.No.4 of 2023 on the file of the I Additional Distict Judge, Rent Control Appellate Tribunal Coimbatore confirming the fair and final Order dated 07.06.2023 in RLTOP.No.85 of 2021 on the file of the Rent Court, Principal District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.

Page 1 / 4

For petitioners : Mr.K.Balasubramaniam Respondent : Mr.R.Narayanan

O R D E R

Challenging the concurrent finding of the Courts below ordering eviction under section 21[2] [A] of Tamilnadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Act 2017 for non registration of the agreement, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.

2. When the matter is taken up toady, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner filed an affidavit of the revision petitioner to the effect that the revision petitioner is willing to vacate the property and seeks one year time, since he is running a hotel and to establish same in another place.

3. The affidavit filed by the revision petitioner is taken on record. Page 2 / 4

4. Considering the nature of the building in which the eviction is ordered, this Court is inclined to grant 6 months time to the revision petitioner to vacate the premises. It is made clear that the petitioner shall vacate the premises without reference to the execution proceedings as undertaken before this Court. In the event, the revision petitioner failed to vacate the premises within six months, the same will invite contempt proceedings.

5. With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22.11.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order vrc Page 3 / 4

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

vrc 22.11.2024 Page 4 / 4