Senthilmurugan v. The State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

WMP.No.31290 of 2019 in W.P.No.30292 of 2018 M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., and R.HEMALATHA, J., [Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.,] Heard the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.E.Manoharan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. This Court, in the order dated 05.12.2018 had observed that on compliance of the conditions in paragraphs nos.9(a) and 9(b), the sole respondent shall order release of the vehicle forthwith and it shall be produced before the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.1, Virudhachalam once in two months at 10.30 a.m on the first working day, till the completion of investigation and the main investigation appears to have been not yet completed.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the paragraph no.5 of the order and would submit that conditions has been scrupulously complied with and due to http://www.judis.nic.in 1/2

M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., and R.HEMALATHA, J., sk the pendency of investigation and other reasons, he found it extremely difficult to comply with the said conditions and would further add that as and when, the respondent requires the vehicle for inspection / verification, the petitioner will promptly produce the same.

4. In the light of the submission made coupled with the reasons assigned in the affidavit, paragraph no.10 of the order dated 05.12.2018 is modified as follows:

The petitioner is directed to produce the vehicle in question namely Multi Axle Goods Tata LPT Lorry bearing TN-88-A-2319 as and when required by the respondent.

The rest of the conditions imposed in the order dated 05.12.2018 remains unaltered.

[M.S.N.,J] [R.H.J,.] 12.12.2019 sk Note:Issue order copy on 16.12.2019.

WMP.No.31290 of 2019 in W.P.No.30292 of 2018 http://www.judis.nic.in 2/2