Madras High CourtWP/31155/2019disposed of

R.Srinivasan v. The Bar Council Of Tamil Nadu

2022-04-06Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan,Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.04.2022 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD W.P.No.31155 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos.31280 & 31282 of 2019 R.Srinivasan ...Petitioner

Versus

1.The Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry, Rep. by its Secretary, High Court Campus, Chennai - 104.

2.The Principal District Judge, Sivagangai.

3.K.Chandru ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose the complaint number 289/2019 after conducting detailed enquiry within stipulated time frame fixed by this Court in order to delete the name of the 3rd respondent permanently from the State Roll.

For Petitioner :

Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan For Respondent - 1 :

Mr.M.R.Jothimanian Respondent - 3 :

Mr.C.D.Johnson

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) The relief sought by the petitioner in this writ petition is to direct the first respondent to dispose of his complaint bearing no.289/2019, with respect to deletion of the name of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

third respondent permanently from the State Roll, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, after conducting a detailed enquiry.

2.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submitted that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the complaint given by the petitioner against the third respondent was taken into consideration and the same was disposed of, by order in D.C.C.No.117 of 2020 dated 30.01.2021 and ultimately, the petitioner withdrew his complaint. Hence, the learned counsel submitted that there is nothing surviving for further adjudication.

3.The aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the first respondent has been fairly conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4.Recording the above, this writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR mrr To 1.The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry, High Court Campus, Chennai - 104.

2.The Principal District Judge, Sivagangai.

Copy to The Section Officer, Legal Cell Section, High Court, Madras.

W.P.No.31155 of 2019 pmk[co] srg 26/04/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/