Madura Coats Ltd., v. Union Of India,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.08.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR W.P.Nos.33829 to 33831 of 2002 and WMP Nos.50024 & 50025 of 2002 1.Madura Coats Limited, New Jail Road, Madurai, through its Vice President-Legal nad Company Secretary, Shri Ajay Seth.

2.Penfibre SDN.Berhad, Lot109-114, Praifree Industrial Zone I, 13600 Prai, Penang, Malaysia, through its duly constituted Power of attorney, Mr.Ajay Seth.

3.Teijin (Thailand) Ltd., 19th Floor, Ploenchit Tower, 898, Ploenchit Road, Kwaeng Lumpini, Khet Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand through its duly constituted power of attorney, Mr.Ajay Seth.

..Petitioners in All Wps .Vs.

1.Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi-110 011.

2.Directorate General of Anti-dumping and Allied Duties, through its Designated Authority, Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi-110 011.

3.Reliance Industries Limited, Makers chambers-IV, 222, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021, through its Managing Director.

4.Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Limited, 51A, Industrial Area, Dst. Dhar, Pithampur (M.P.), through its Managing Director.

..Respondents in all WPs Prayer in W.P.No.33829 of 2002:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the Preliminary Finding of the Designated Authority 2nd respondent dated 16th January 2002 published on 17th January, 2002 quash the same.

Prayer in W.P.No.33830 of 2002:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the notification of the first respondent in Custom Notification No.69 of 2002 - Customs dated 10th, July, 2002, quash the same.

Prayer in W.P.No.33831 of 2002:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to disclose all information sought by the Petitioners as set out in para 36 of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. For petitioner :Mr.R.Pavithara in All WPs For Respondents : Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao for RR 1 & 2 SCCG COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in all these three cases submits that the prayers sought for herein become infructuous. Hence, he has made an endorsement in the Court bundle.

2.Recording the said submission, and the endorsement made in the Court bundle, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar KP To

1. The Secretary, Union of India Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi-110 011.

2. The Designated Authority, Directorate General of Anti-dumping and Allied Duties, Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi-110 011.

W.P.Nos.33829 to 33831 of 2002 and WMP Nos.50024 & 50025 of 2002 RMP(27/09/2018)