Muthuramalingam v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.10.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Muthuramalingam ... Petitioner Vs.

l.The Superintendent of Police, Perambalur District .

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Perambalur District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Perambalur Police Station, Perambalur 4.The Superintendent of Police, 5.The Inspector of Police, 6.Mr.Chinnakannu, The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Muthukulathur Sub Division, 1/5

7.Mr.Saravanan, The Sub Inspector of Police, 8.Mr.Sivasamy, The Sub Inspector of Police, Peraiyur Police Station, ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent nos.l and 2 to constitute a team containing honest officers to conduct the investigation on the supervision of the respondents nos. 1 and 2 in crime no. 419 of 2023 on the file of the respondent no.3 and take appropriate action against the respondents 6 to 8 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2024 in accordance with law within the time stipulated For Petitioner : Mr.J.Sadam Hussain For R1 to R5 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The motor accident case registered in Crime No.416 of 2023 based on the information given by one Ranjith Kumar as against two persons namely Selvaraj and Sudalai, which is the subject matter of writ petition. The petitioner Muthuramalingam son of Muthumani claiming that the 2/5

investigation in this case not been properly conducted by the present Investigating Officer and therefore, pray for a team to be constituted and supervised by the Superintendent of Police and Deputy Superintendent of Police by way of writ of Mandamus.

2.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submits that the investigation is done properly and the final report will be filed within a period of two months. The information furnished by the petitioner will also taken note in the course of investigation.

3.

Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed, since the allegation made by the petitioner and the reason for constituting team is not made out. No costs.

23.10.2024 rpl Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To l.The Superintendent of Police, Perambalur District .

3/5

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Perambalur District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Perambalur Police Station, Perambalur 4.The Superintendent of Police, 5.The Inspector of Police, 6.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai 4/5

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

rpl 23.10.2024 5/5