Ilayaraja v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.10.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Ilayaraja

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State rep by Inspector of Police Sipcot Police Station, Krishnagiri District ( Crime No.316 of 2024)

...Respondent/Complainant

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. Act, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.316 of 2024 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.J. Pradeep For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinothkumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ***** 1/6

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.09.2024 for the offences under Section 24(1) of COTPA Act and Section 77 of JJ Act, 2015 in Crime No.316 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 1.368 kilo grams of banned tobacco products. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.09.2024 ; that he is a law-abiding citizen; that he is ready to furnish substantial sureties for his due release on bail; and therefore, he prays for the grant of bail to the petitioner.

2/6

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) opposes the grant of bail to the petitioner by stating that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 1.368 kilo grams of banned tobacco products. He further submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6.Considering the representation made on both sides, nature of offence and the quantity of material involved in this case and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner, and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Hosur and on further conditions that:

3/6

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday for a period of 30 days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond;

[c] the Petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected; [d] the Petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

[e] the Petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial 4/6

Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

14.10.2024 smn To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Hosur 2.The Sub Jail, Hosur 3.The Inspector of Police Sipcot Police Station, Krishnagiri District 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

P.DHANABAL, J.

smn 14.10.2024 6/6