Madras High CourtCRL OP/28788/2017dismissed as infructuous

Mrs.S.Subha, Aged 36 Years, v. State Rep. By,

2021-08-03Honourable Mrs Justice V.Bhavani Subbaroyan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.08.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Crl.O.P No.28788 of 2017 and Crl.M.P No.16260 of 2017 S.Subha ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State, Rep. by The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Mannargudi, (Crime No. 7 of 2012).

2. Saravana Kumar Chowdary

3. Sadasivam 4.Kathirkamavalli

...Respondents

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to transfer the case pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mannargudi in C.C.No.330 of 2012 to try along with the case pending before the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai in M.C.No.74 of 2012.

For Petitioner : Mr. V.S.Rajaram For R1 : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Counsel for Govt. of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) For RR 2 to 4 : Mr.K.Soundararajan

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to transfer the case pending from the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mannargudi in C.C.No.330 of 2012 to the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai in M.C.No.74 of 2012.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the 1st respondent, on instructions, submitted that there was some matrimonial dispute between the petitioner/de-facto complainant and the second respondent. The third and fourth https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondents are in-laws of the petitioner. After mutual discussion among them, the respondents 2 to 4 filed their Compromise Memo before the Court below. In order to identify the respective parties they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card and it is made part of the record and the respondents 2 to 4 have entered into a compromise and amicably settled their issues in C.C.No.330 of 2012. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

3. In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the 1st respondent, the relief sough for by the petitioner in this petition has now become infructuous. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msm To

1. The Judicial Magistrate Mannargudi.

2. The IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai.

3. The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Mannargudi, (Cr.No. 7 of 2012).

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P No.28788 of 2017 and Crl.M.P No.16260 of 2017 PL(CO) SB(24/08/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/