C.Sivaraman v. The Commissioner Madurai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.14786 of 2004 G.Sivaraman

...Petitioner

vs.

The Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Corporation, Aringnar Anna Malaigai, Madurai - 2.

...Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to seeking Writ of Mandamus, directing the responding to adjust the money i.e. a sum of Rs.3,83,000/- paid by the petitioner towards the payment for cutting and removing guinea grass from Plot No.6 Avaniyapuram Sewage Water farm, Madurai, calculating at the rate of Rs.200/- per ton on par with outsiders.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ananthapadmanabhan For Respondent : Mr.P.Srinivasan

ORDER

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has now become infructuous due to the long passage of time. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VII) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar Pam https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Corporation, Aringnar Anna Malaigai, Madurai - 2.

+1cc Government Pleader in sr.no.50136 W.P.No.14786 of 2004 NR 27/07/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/