K.Thanasingu, v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 24.07.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN WP.No.13389/2017 & WMP.No.14425/2017 K.Thanasingu ... Petitioner

Versus

1.The District Collector cum Panchayat Inspector Cuddalore Collectorate, Cuddalore.

2.The Special Officer The Block Development Officer Panchayat Union, Panruti.

... Respondents Prayer : - Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the entire records in connection with the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.A4/3350/2017 dated 22.04.2017 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner :

Mr. M.Sriram

For Respondents :

Mr.S.Ravikumar, Spl.GP

ORDER

(1) Learned counsel for the petitioner sought time stating that the learned counsel was not able to contact the petitioner herein. (2) However, the learned Special Government Pleader has forwarded instructions received from the Block Development Officer, Panchayat Union at Panruti, wherein it had been stated that the petitioner had given an undertaking that he would withdraw the writ petition. It is further stated that the petitioner is now working as Secretary at Sorathur Panchayat Union.

(3) Learned Special Government Pleader also forwarded the request in writing by the petitioner herein. The petitioner had also stated that he would withdraw the writ petition. It is probably for that reason, that he has not contacted his counsel and not responded to the calls made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(4) The writ petition stands dismissed as no issue arises for adjudication. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 24.07.2023 AP Internet : Yes To 1.The District Collector cum Panchayat Inspector Cuddalore Collectorate, Cuddalore.

2.The Special Officer The Block Development Officer Panchayat Union, Panruti.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J., AP 24.07.2023