Syamala Sundarraj v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.01.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Sysmala Sundarraj ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, W-16, All Women Police Station, Pulianthope, Chennai-12.

2.Santhosh Premkumar ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Revision Case has been filed under sections 397 read with 401 of Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records and set aside the same in so far as in exclusion of offences under Sections 376 (AB), 376(c), 342, 354(B) IPC and consequently direct the Sessions Judge, Special Court for the Exclusive Trial of POCSO Act cases, Chennai to include said offence under Sections 376 (AB), 376(c), 342, 354(B) IPC in Crl.M.P.No.1054 of 2022 in Spl.S.C.No.23 of 2022 daed 29.09.2022.

For Petitioner : Ms.D.Sneha For R1 : Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case and has circulated a letter dated 10.01.2023 to the Registry to that effect. He also made an endorsement in the revision petition.

2. In view of the submission of the letter dated 10.01.2023 to the Registry and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed as withdrawn. 11.01.2023 rpl To 1.The Sessions Judge, Special Court for the Exclusive Trial of POCSO Act cases, Chennai.

2.The Inspector of Police, W-16, All Women Police Station, Pulianthope, Chennai-12.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai-104.

V.SIVAGNANAM, J., rpl 11.01.2023