J.Daniel v. Arockiya Cletus Floria

in O.P.No.250 of 2023 R.N.MANJULA, J.

The petitioner has filed this Application seeking to recall the order dated 15.09.2023 in G.W.O.P.No.250 of 2023 by stating that the order does not contain anything about the visitation rights that can be exercised by the petitioner.

2. In fact, the petitioner, who was a respondent/father in the earlier G.W.O.P.No.250 of 2023, did not make any representation, at the time when the order was passed. However, the order has been passed on merits based on the materials submitted by the petitioner. Even now, the petitioner is not claiming any custody, but his limited request is only for an order as to visitation.

3. In such a case, it is unnecessary to recall the order through which the guardianship was given to the 1/3

respondent/petitioner/mother. If the petitioner is interested in getting any order as to the visitation, it is up to him to file a fresh application either before the Family Court, if any matrimonial dispute is pending between himself and the respondent/petitioner/mother or to file a fresh application before this Court for getting visitation rights.

4. With these observations, this Application is disposed of.

29.04.2024 RM 2/3

R.N.MANJULA, J.

RM in O.P.No.250 of 2023 29.04.2024 3/3