Mrs.C.Karpagam v. 1.The Commr. Thiruvathipuram

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.08.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.34312 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.No.41608 of 2003 C.Karpagam .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commissioner, Thiruvathipuram Municipality, Cheyyar Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

2. The Chairman, Thiruvathipuram Municipality, Cheyyar Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

3. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

.. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings dated 10.11.2003 of the 1st respondent and relating to the tender and consequently directing the respondents to issue re-tender notice as per the relevant provision. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents: Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Advocate for RR1 & 2 No Appearance for R3

O R D E R

When the writ petition came up for hearing on 21.08.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" today. Even today (22.08.2017), inspite of the writ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petition being listed under the said caption and the name of the counsel for the petitioner being called twice, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bri To

1. The Commissioner, Thiruvathipuram Municipality, Cheyyar Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

2. The Chairman, Thiruvathipuram Municipality, Cheyyar Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

3. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

W.P.No.34312 of 2003 rj(co) aa11/09/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/