P.Prabhakaran v. The District Collector

in W.P.No.33616 of 2024 M.SUNDAR.J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,) Captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' ['WMP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of 'notice dated 08.07.2024 bearing reference Thakithu.No.15/Encroachment/2024/ E.Ni.Ou issued by R3' [hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

2. The reasons to support the dispense with prayer have not been articulated in the support affidavit. However, in the hearing, it is submitted that a copy of the impugned order was obtained from similar placed persons.

3. Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the 1/3

impugned order is not subjected to contestation or disputation, as a one M.SUNDAR.J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., off case, we are considering the dispense with prayer making it clear that in the days to come, adequate articulation in the support affidavit is imperative.

4. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for. [M.S.J.,] [K.R.S.J.,] 18.11.2024 gpa (2/2) 2/3

in W.P.No.33616 of 2024 3/3