The Management v. The Presiding Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 29-11-2019 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.13723 of 2017 The Management, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.

..

Petitioner vs.

1.The Presiding Officer, II Additional Labour Court, City Civil Court Annexure Buildings, High Court Compound, Chennai-600 104.

2.Thiru N.Alpandilora .. Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the order passed in C.P.No.1154 of 2010 dated 27.01.2017 on the file of the first respondent herein and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Chindambaram For Respondent-1 : Labour Court For Respondent-2 : Mr.S.T.Varadarajulu

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner made a submission that during the pendency of the writ petition, the second respondent-workman was reinstated into service and the second respondent-workman is working with the writ petitioner-Management now.

2. In view of the fact that the Award of the first respondent-Labour Court is implemented by the writ petitionerManagement, no further adjudication needs to be entertained in respect of the grounds raised in the present writ petition. 1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is dismissed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CO) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar Svn To The Presiding Officer, II Additional Labour Court, City Civil Court Annexure Building, High Court Compound, Chennai-600 104.

+1 cc to M/s.M.Chidambaram Advocate sr100168 +1 cc to M/s.S.T.Varadarajulu Advocate sr100120 WP No.13723 of 2017 aa02/01/2020 2/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/