Narendra Harlalka v. Pavan Kumar Harlalka

Crl.M.P.No.14468 of 2024 in Crl.RC.No.1685 of 2024 M. NIRMAL KUMAR , J.

Today, a implead petition is filed by the accused.

2. The petitioner / de facto complainant has no objection in allowing the implead petition.

3. It is necessary to hear the implead petitioners before passing any adverse orders against them.

4. In view of the same, implead petition is allowed.

5. Registry is directed to carry out necessary and consequential amendments.

Post the Criminal Revision case on 07.11.2024.

22.10.2024 mk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1