Pichumani @ Manikandan v. Inspector Of Police

CRL.O.P.No.29963 of 2022 CRL.O.P.No.29963 of 2022 T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.08.2022 for the offence punishable under Sections 332, 341, 395, 397 IPC in Cr.No.328 of 2022, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused waylaid the defacto complainant and by assaulting him taken away a sum of Rs.2000/-, Samsung J7 mobile phone and 2 sovereigns of gold from him. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He submit that the petitioner is in custody from 30.08.2022. Hence prays for grant of anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that this is the second bail petition and the earlier petition has been dismissed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.27235 of 2022. He would submit https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL.O.P.No.29963 of 2022 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

anu that the petitioner has got five previous cases, which are similar in nature and that the property has not been recovered. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the gravity of offence committed by the petitioner and that there are five previous cases of similar nature pending against the petitioner, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 06.12.2022 anu CRL.O.P.No.29963 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis