Anandharaj v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN CRL.R.C.No.1272 of 2019 Anandharaj S/o, Kandhasamy

...Petitioner

Versus

The State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Karimangalam Police Station, Dharmapuri District.

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 397 r/w section 40 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to setaside the judgment in Crl.M.P.No.1111 of 2019 in S.C.No.48 of 2017 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Chandrasekar For Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran Government Advocate, (Criminal Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner to setaside the order in Crl.M.P.No.1111 of 2019 in S.C.No.48 of 2017 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri.

2. The revision petitioner is not a party to the case in S.C.No.48 of 2017 and he is said to have the owner of the property. The judgment in S.C.No.48 of 2017 itself, the trial court observed that after the appeal time is over, the material object is ordered to be returned to the original owner. During the pendency of the appeal, the petitioner filed this revision petition. Since the appeal is pending, the Revision petition is dismissed as premature and after completing the trial and dispose of the sessions case in S.C.No.48 of 2017 , https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the revision petitioner is directed to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. Hence, the Revision Petition is dismissed.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar mfa To

1. The Principal Sessions Judge, Principal Sessions Court, Dharmapuri.

2. The Inspector of Police, Karimangalam Police Station, Dharmapuri District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

CRL.R.C.No.1272 of 2019 NSK 27/08/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/