← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P/2001/2019closed

N.Narayana Reddy v. P.S.Amalraj

2021-04-28Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh,Honourable Ms Justice R.N.Manjula3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.04.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA Contempt Petition No.2001 of 2019 N.Narayana Reddy, Beegasettypalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District .. Petitioner Vs 1.Mr.P.S.Amalraj, The Chairman, State Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, High Court Campus, Chennai - 600 104.

2.Mr.C.Rajkumar, The Secretary, State Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, High Court Campus, Chennai - 600 104.

3.Bar Council of India, Rep. by its Secretary, No.21, Rouse Avenue, Industrial Area, New Delhi - 110 002 (R3 suo motu impleaded vide order dated 05.01.2021) .. Respondents Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971 to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.14796 of 2017 dated 29.06.2017.

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondent :

Mr.S.R.Raghunathan for R3

ORDER

(Made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) Alleging that the order dated 29.06.2017 made in W.P.No.14796 of 2017 has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed.

2.By suo motu order dated 05.01.2021, the Bar Council of India represented by its Secretary has been impleaded as third respondent. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the impleaded third respondent submitted that in view of the ongoing pandemic widely prevalent, it would take another six months to complete the proceedings, as it has bee transferred to the third respondent in view of the mandate of Section 36B of the Advocates Act, 1961. Learned counsel appearing for the third respondent further submitted that time limit has been extended for the completion of the proceedings by respondents 1 and 2, taking into consideration the ongoing pandemic situation. 4.In view of the above, we direct respondents 1 and 2 to comply with the order passed by this court within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, taking note of the fact that the files have been transferred from the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu to Bar Council of

India, the third respondent is directed to re-transfer the files to respondents 1 and 2 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.With the above direction, the contempt petition stands closed. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) mmi //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2021. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

Gs/07/07/2021