Manikandan v. State Rep By
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.175 of 2022 seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 30.03.2022 at about 3p.m., when the defacto complainant was working in the company viz., Trans Enterprises at Uttakdau, the petitioner along with other accused persons have entered into the said company and scolded the defacto complainant with filthy language, assaulted him and criminally intimidated him. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner was granted anticipatory 1/5
bail by the court below vide order dated 27.04.2022 in Crl.MP.No.530 of 2022 and due to his personal inconvenience, he was unable to produce the sureties as directed by the court below. Therefore, the earlier order got lapsed. Now, the present petition has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail before this Court. He would also submit that the petitioner is prepared to abide by any stringent conditions imposed by this Court.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on 30.03.2022 at about 3p.m., when the defacto complainant was working in the company viz., Trans Enterprises at Uttakdau, the petitioner along with other accused persons have entered into the said company and scolded the defacto complainant with filthy language, assaulted him and criminally intimidated him.
Hence, he would vehemently oppose to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by both counsel, this Court is inclined to grant 2/5
anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Kancheepuram on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two blood related sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
3/5
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
02.12.2022 Vv 4/5
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
Vv 02.12.2022 5/5