← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/26103/2024granted

Vicky@Vellai v. The State Rep.By

2024-10-22Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.10.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Crl.O.P.No.26103 of 2024 Vicky @Vellai ...Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Arakonam Town Police Station, Ranipet District (Crime No.66 of 2021)

...Respondent

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending trial in Spl.Sc.No.129/2021 pending on the file of the Special Court for the exclusive trial of POCSO Act cases, Vellore District in Crime No.66 of 2021.

For Petitioner : Mr.B. Bala Vijayan For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinothkumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ***** 1/6

O R D E R

The petitioner seeks bail in Spl.Sc.No.129/2021 pending on the file of the Special Court for the exclusive trial of POCSO Act cases, Vellore District for the offences under Sections 363,366,376(2)(n) of I.P.C and Section 5(l),6 of POCSO Act, 2012 in Crime No.66 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. The petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody on 05.05.2024 on execution of NBW issued against him on 09.05.2022.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an accused facing trial in Spl.Sc.No.129/2021 pending on the file of the Special Court for the exclusive trial of POCSO Act cases, Vellore District. He further submitted that since the petitioner was unable to appear before the trial Court, he was issued with the non-bailable warrant on 09.05.2022, and pursuant to the same, he was arrested on 05.05.2024. He also submitted that the petitioner will undertake that hereafter he will regularly appear before the trial court on all hearing dates and also stated that he is prepared to comply with any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the 2/6

petitioner.

3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that since the petitioner, facing trial in Spl.Sc.No.129/2021 pending on the file of the Special Court for the exclusive trial of POCSO Act cases, Vellore District, has failed to appear before the trial Court and therefore, the trial Court has issued a NBW against the petitioner on 09.05.2022, and pursuant to which NBW issued against the petitioner, he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.05.2024. Hence, he oppose for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the fact that bail was already granted to the petitioner and thereafter NBW was issued and the same has been 3/6

executed and considering the fact that after completion of investigation, final report has also been filed and now the case is posted for examination of witnesses, the period of custody undergone by the petitioner and also considering the undertaking given by the petitioner that he is ready to cooperate for speedy disposal of the trial, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Court for the exclusive trial of POCSO Act Cases, Vellore , and on further conditions that :- [a] the petitioner shall report before the Trial Court, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders, without fail. [b] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

4/6

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

22.10.2024 smn To 1.The Exclusive trial of POCSO Act Cases, Vellore

2. The Inspector of Police, Arakonam Town Police Station, Ranipet District 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

P.DHANABAL, J.

smn 5/6

22.10.2024 6/6