← Library
Madras High CourtWP/32199/2023dismissed

C.Subramani v. The District Collector

2023-11-10Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.11.2023 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY C.Subramani ..

Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector Office of District Collector Vellore, Vellore District.

2. The District Revenue Officer Office of District Revenue Officer Vellore, Vellore District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of Revenue Divisional Officer Kudiyatham, Vellore District.

4. The Tahsildar Office of Tahsildar Pernambut, Pernambut Taluk Vellore District.

5. The Block Development Officer Office of Block Development Office Pernambut, Vellore District.

6. Pachiayammal ..

Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner representation dated 09.05.2022 and 14.09.2023 to remove the encroachment in S.No.191/8-1.54 cents Punchai DC lands in No.33 Morasapalli Village, Pernambut Taluk, Vellore District. For the Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesan For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Government Pleader for R1 to R5

ORDER

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard Mr.C.Venkatesan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 5.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sixth respondent has occupied the property owned by the petitioner. The property is meant for depressed class and the petitioner is from the depressed class. It is submitted that the sixth respondent does not belong to the depressed class.

3. It appears that the petitioner has executed the documents in favour of the sixth respondent and has taken money from the sixth respondent.

4. If the case of the petitioner is that the documents have been executed by coercive or fraudulent methods, then the remedy for the petitioner would be elsewhere. The petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate proceedings as may be permissible under law.

5. In the light of that, the writ petition stands dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 10.11.2023 Index :

Yes/No :

Yes/No drm

To

1. The District Collector Office of District Collector Vellore, Vellore District.

2. The District Revenue Officer Office of District Revenue Officer Vellore, Vellore District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of Revenue Divisional Officer Kudiyatham, Vellore District.

4. The Tahsildar Office of Tahsildar Pernambut, Pernambut Taluk Vellore District.

5. The Block Development Officer Office of Block Development Office Pernambut, Vellore District.

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

(drm) 10.11.2023