← Library
Madras High CourtCMP/26160/2024ordered

L.Susheela v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2024-12-10Honourable Mr Justice S. S. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal2 pages

CMP. 26160 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10-12-2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CMP. 26160 of 2024 in W.A.SR.No.140055 of 2024 L.SUSHEELA W/O. LATE LAKSHMANAN, NO.10, BHRATHIDASAN STREET, BHARATHIYAR NAGAR, THANDARAI, PATTABIRAM, CHENNAI600 072 AND ANOTHER APPELLANT(S) Vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, SANTHOME HIGH ROAD, CHENNAI-600 028 AND 8 OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) Prayer in C.M.P.No.26160 of 2024 : Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 79 days in preferring the Writ Appeal against the order dated 18.03.2024 passed in W.P.SR.No.164204 of 2024. Prayer in W.A.SR.No.140055 of 2024 : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 18.03.2024 passed in W.P.SR.No.164204 of 2024 on the file of this Court.

For Appellant(s):

MR.R.SELVAKUMAR For Respondent(s):

NO APPEARANCE FOR R1 TO R3 MR.A.SELVENDRAN, SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R4 AND R5 MR.A.R.SURESH FOR R6 TO R9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S. Sundar J) This petition is filed to condone the delay of 79 days in preferring the above Writ Appeal. 2.Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 4 and 5. Mr.A.R.Suresh, learned counsel, takes notice for the respondents 6 to 9. Both the learned counsel have no serious objection in allowing this petition. However, today, there is no representation on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. Though notice sent through Court to respondents 2 and 3 have not yet returned, private notice has been served on respondents 1 to

3. Therefore, this Court is inclined to consider the application on merits. 3.The petitioners, in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, have given sufficient cause for the delay. This Court is convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Since the delay has been properly and satisfactorily explained, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered.

(S.S. SUNDAR J.) (P. DHANABAL J.) 10-12-2024 M. KANNAN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis