Paul Pradeep v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.30090 of 2019 Paul Pradeep.C.N.

... Petitioner Vs.

The State Represented by :- Inspector of Police, Vadapalani, Chennai.

(Crime No.16 of of 2019) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.16 of 2019 pending on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Chinnasamy For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl side)

O R D E R

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 323 and 498A of IPC in Cr.No.16 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant got married in the year 2015. Though the petitioner had illicit relationship with other women, difference of opinion arose between the couple and lived separately. After pacifying the dispute, in the year 2018, they joined together. But the petitioner has not changed his attitude and abused the defacto complainant physically frequently. Hence, the defacto complainant has lodged a complaint against her husband before the respondent police. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the petitioner has not been committed any offence and the petitioner is innocent and due to family dispute, a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate submits that in an earlier occasion, this Court has directed the parties to attend the mediation. However, the same was failed. The respondent police has completed the investigation and filed charge sheet.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and investigation has been completed and charge sheet has also been filed, the present petition is wholly misconceived. Accordingly, this petition is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Court for necessary relief by filing appropriate petition.

-sd/- 17/06/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 XXII METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, SAIDAPET,CHENNAI 2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI(FOR INFORMATION) 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE W-27, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VADAPALANI, CHENNAI.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 5 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, TAMIL NADU MEDIATION AND CONCILATION CENTRE, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.S.CHINNASAMY Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.30090/2019 Date :17/06/2021 RVR 12/07/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/