D.V.Venkatesan v. N.R. Subramanian
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.02.2019 CORAM :
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P. (NPD) No.4140 of 2017 and C.M.P. No.19408 of 2017 D.V.Venkatesan ... Revision Petitioner Vs.
N.R.Subramanian ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the order made in I.A.No.446 of 2016 in O.S.No.270 of 2012 dated 11.09.2017 on the file of the Principal District Court, Kancheepuram at Chengalpattu.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthil Nathan For Respondent : Mr.R.Gunaalan for Mr.C.V.Kumar
O R D E R
The above Civil Revision Petition has been filed, challenging the order, dismissing the application of the revision petitioner/defendant for condoning the delay of 1152 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree.
2.The suit in O.S.No.270 of 2012 had been filed by the respondent herein, for recovery of a sum of Rs.35,94,500/- due towards a promissory note. The defendant, after entering appearance, has thereafter not participated in the proceedings. Subsequently, an exparte decree came to be passed on 18.01.2013. Even thereafter, the revision petitioner/defendant remained quiet and it is only when the execution proceedings had been initiated, the impugned application came to be filed by the revision petitioner/defendant. The reason for the delay has been attributed to the fact that, after handing over the brief, the revision petitioner was on an impression that, all other matters would be taken care of by his counsel and it is seen that he had not bothered to contact his counsel, thereafter. 3.
Considering the fact that the revision petitioner has put across a defence that, he does not owe the said amount, this Court is inclined to condone the delay and set aside the exparte decree on condition that, a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty lakhs only) is deposited to the credit of the suit in O.S.No.270 of 2012 within a period of six weeks from today, failing which, the order allowing this Civil Revision Petition shall stand automatically vacated and the order impugned in this revision shall stand restored. 4.
revision petitioner/defendant.
5.In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed on the above lines. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 28.02.2019 mkn Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Speaking order / Nonspeaking order To The Principal District Judge, Kancheepuram at Chengalpattu.
P.T.ASHA, J.
mkn C.R.P. (NPD) No.4140 of 2017 and C.M.P. No.19408 of 2017 28.02.2019