Mrs. Jesanthamary v. The State Rep By Its,

Crl.O.P.No.785 of 2023 Crl.O.P.No.785 of 2023 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 & 506(1) of IPC, in Crime No.17 of 2019, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and her husband joined together and cheated the defacto complainant to the tune of Rs.50,00,000/-. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that she is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner and her husband joined together and cheated the defacto complainant to the tune of Rs.50,00,000/-. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.785 of 2023 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

gbi

5. Taking into consideration the gravity of offence, the amount involved in this case, the investigation is at crucial stage, there is possibility of tampering the witnesses, hampering the investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. gbi 01.02.2023 Crl.O.P.No.785 of 2023 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis