Gurumoorthy v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.10.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI Gurumoorthy

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Peralam Police Station, Thiruvarur District.

(Crime No.538 of 2023)

...Respondent

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 328 of Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.538 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police.

For Petitioner : Mr.T. Muruganantham For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.side) 1/6

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.10.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 273, 328 of I.P.C r/w Section 6 and 20(1) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 in Crime No.538 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has falsely implicated in this case. He is in judicial custody from 02.10.2023. Thus, he prays for grant of bail.

3. In reply, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) oppose this petition, on the ground that, petitioner was found to be in possession of 3450 packets of Chapp Tobacco which is a banned tobacco product. Therefore, he prays for dismissal of this bail petition.

4. Considering the fact that, tobacco products have been recovered from the petitioner and that petitioner is in judicial custody 2/6

from 02.10.2023 and the fact that material part of the investigation might have been over by this time, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner without prejudice to their defence shall deposit a non-refundable sum of Rs.10,000/-, by way of Demand Draft to the Cancer Institute (WIA), East Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai and that the receipt of such payment shall be produced before the concerned Magistrate at the time of executing the bond; It is made clear that merely, 3/6

because the petitioner deposits the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., until further orders.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

26.10.2023 smn/vca 4/6

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam 2.The Central Prison, Trichy.

3.The Inspector of Police, Peralam Police Station,Thiruvarur District.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 5/6

R.KALAIMATHI, J.

smn/vca 26.10.2023 6/6