Suresh v. The State Rep.By Its,

Crl.O.P.No.24907 of 2023 Crl.O.P.No.24907 of 2023 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN.,J.

The petitioner/A1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 4(1)(aaa), 14A, 4(1-A) of TNP Act, in Crime No.514 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of 110 litters of ID arrack and the petitioner had ran away from the place. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, the petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that there is also yet another case is pending against the petitioner in Crime No.537 of 2023 which was registered under Section 25(1)(b) of provisions Act for possession of country Gun. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

Crl.O.P.No.24907 of 2023 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J., nvi 5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record.

6.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and the nature and gravity of the offence committed by the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 07.11.2023 nvi Crl.O.P.No.24907 of 2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2