K.Jayan Joshua v. The State Rep. By
R.KALAIMATHI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 306 and 511 of IPC in Crime No.457 of 2023, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner herein and the defacto-complainant was working in the Hitachi Energy Company. There was a love affair between them. Thereafter, this petitioner refused to marry her and neglected the defacto-complainant since his family members had not accepted their love. On 02.10.2023 the defactocomplainant had consumed the Lyzol floor cleaner liquid in her parent's house. Thereafter, she was taken into hospital and discharged on the same day. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the defactocomplainant had already been separated and living independently. This petitioner had not committed any offences as alleged by the respondent police. He further stated that this petitioner is innocent person, he is no 1/5
way connected with the said alleged offences. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.
4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that this petitioner cheated the defactocomplainant and had love affair with the defacto-complainant by promising to marry her. The defacto-complainant is now six months pregnant. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to this petitioner.
5. Taking into consideration of the above facts, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Madhavaram, Chennai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to 2/5
the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police on every Monday at 05.00p.m., until further orders.
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the 3/5
conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
26.10.2023 gvn/gd 4/5
R.KALAIMATHI, J .
gvn/gd 26.10.2023 5/5