Nandhini v. Sathyan

CMP.No.25536 of 2024 in CMA.SR.No.102125 of 2024 M.DHANDAPANI, J.

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 868 days in filing the above appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.152/2021 dated 30.11.2021 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Mahila Court, Nagapattinam.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Though the name of the second respondent is printed in the cause list, there is no representation for the second respondent. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, notice to the first respondent is dispensed with.

3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Court is inclined to order this petition.

4. Accordingly this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission.

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

ssb

5. It is underscored that in the eventuality of the petitioners succeeding in the appeal to be taken on record, they would not be entitled to any interest for 868 days.

02.12.2024 ssb CMP.No.25536 of 2024 in CMA.SR.No.102125 of 2024 _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis