K.Dhilip v. The Superintendent Of Police,

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC in Crime No. Not known of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has totally received a sum of Rs.19,00,000/- from the defacto complainants under the false promise of getting government job. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged. He would further submit that the petitioner is prepared to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the the defacto complainants have paid a sum of Rs.19 lakhs to the account of the petitioner and the petitioner has gave a false promise that he will arrange for a government job and other facilities in the business by stating that his uncle is in key post in a political party. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.The learned counsel for the intervenors would submit that they have totally transferred a sum of Rs.19,00,000/- to the petitioner. They also filed typed set of papers containing the bank transactions to prove the same. Further, they have also enclosed one document, which is in Page No.7 of typed set of papers, which shows that one Geethapriya, wife of the petitioner has got job in the H.R. & C.E. Department.

6.Heard the learned counsel for the parties and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record.

7.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that petitioner has received a sum of Rs.19,00,000/- from the defacto complainants under the guise of getting government job, this Court feels that a detailed enquiry is required in this matter. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

8.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 23.12.2022 sp (3/3)

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

sp 23.12.2022 (3/3)