M/S.Green Ayur Care v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.11.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.P.Nos.32983 & 32988 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.35778 & 35784 of 2024 W.P.No.32983 of 2024 M/s.Green Ayur Care, Rep by its Proprietor, Mr.Hariharan, S/o.Narayanan, D.No.1210, Block 38, 3rd Floor, Gandhi Nagar, Keeranantham Post, ... Petitioner vs Thudiyalur Police Station, 3.The Commissioner, ... Respondents Page No.1 of 6

W.P.No.32988 of 2024 M/s.Aura Ayur Spa, Rep by its Proprietor, Mr.Hariharan, S/o.Narayanan, D.No.1210, Block 38, 3rd Floor, Gandhi Nagar, Keeranantham Post, ... Petitioner vs Vadavalli Police Station, 3.The Commissioner, ... Respondents PRAYER in W.P.No.32983 of 2024: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the 2nd respondents from interfering in anyway with the business of the petitioner namely "Green Ayur Care" at No.50, Adithya Residency, 3rd Street, G.N.Mills Post, Coimbatore - 641 029.

Page No.2 of 6

PRAYER in W.P.No.32988 of 2024: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the 2nd respondents from interfering in anyway with the business of the petitioner namely "Aura Ayur Care" at No.257, Kongu Nagar, K.V.Palayam, Marudamalai Main Road, Vadavalli Village, Coimbatore - 641 029. For Petitioner in both Writ Petitions :

Mr.A.Sathasivam For Respondents in both Writ Petitions :

Mr.S.Sugendran, Additional Public Prosecutor COMMON ORDER The petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent Police from interfering in anyway with his business. 2.It is the case of the petitioner that he is running an Ayurvedhic Centre and Spa which offers cross-gender massages; and that the respondents are interfering with his business. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents in both Writ Petitions would submit that the Police are not interfering with the business of the petitioner, but are conducting Page No.3 of 6

investigation on the FIR registered against the petitioners under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.

4.In view of the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court is of the view that the prayer sought for by the petitioner in both the writ petitions is not maintainable. 5.Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. 08.11.2024 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Index : Yes/No vv2 To Thudiyalur Police Station, Page No.4 of 6

3.The Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, 4.The Commissioner, 5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page No.5 of 6

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

vv2 08.11.2024 Page No.6 of 6