Gangaram v. State By
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 273, 328 of IPC r/w 7(1) and 20(2) of COTPA Act 2003 in Crime No.342 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police on regular patrol found the petitioner's car transported 209 Kgs of TOBACCO by the driver without license from the Government authority. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner who is the owner of the car bearing Reg.No. KA51MS7773 transported 209Kgs of TOBACCO by the driver. He further submitted that the value of the goods is worth about Rs.5,40,000/-. Hence he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the Page No.1/4
petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sankari on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand only) to the credit of Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerk Association, Chennai within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.
[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
Page No.2/4
[c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks, thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[f] the petitioner shall surrender the R.C. Book before the learned Magistrate/Trial Court if not recovered by the respondent police. [g] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[h] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
13.12.2022 dpq Page No.3/4
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
dpq 13.12.2022 Page No.4/4