Annamalai v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.10.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL

1. Annamalai

2. Vikram @ Vicky @ Kiyamiya ...Petitioner/Accused Nos. 1 & 3 Vs.

State rep by The Inspector of Police, F-2 Egmore Police Station Chennai.

(Crime No.267 of 2024)

...Respondent/Complainant

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No. 267 of 2024 on the file of the respondent.

*** For Petitioners : Mr.C.Raja For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinothkumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6

O R D E R

The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.09.2024 for the offences under Sections 8(c), read with 20(b)(ii)(B), 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.267 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners were found in possession of 400 grams each of Ganja. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons, they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are law-abiding citizens and they are ready to furnish substantial sureties for their due release on bail; therefore, he prays for the grant of bail to the petitioners.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioners were found in possession of 400 grams each of Ganja. He would further submit that the first petitioner is having four previous cases 2/6

and the second petitioner is having one previous case. Hence, he would object for granting bail.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the submissions made on both sides, the quantity of material involved in this case, and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioners from 06.09.2024 and though the petitioners are having some previous cases, in all those cases, they were granted bail, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions:

[a]. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned XIV Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai, and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioners shall report before the NDPS Court, on all working days, at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] The petitioners shall attend in accordance with the conditions 3/6

of the bond;

[d] The petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which they are suspected;

[e] The petitiones shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[f] the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with evidence; [g] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State 4/6

of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and [h] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of the BNS.

24.10.2024 vsg To

1. XIV Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai. 2.Central Prison, Puzhal II.

3.The Inspector of Police, F-2 Egmore Police Station Chennai.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

P.DHANABAL, J.

vsg 5/6

24.10.2024 6/6