Athikesavan v. The Inspector Of Police,

P.DHANABAL, J.

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for the alleged offences under Sections 115[2], 118[1], 133, 296[b] of BNS Act 2023 read with Section 3[1] TNPPDL read with Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.572 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, in a wordy quarrel, the petitioners along with other accused had assaulted the defacto complainant and caused injury and destroyed the house hold articles. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case due to the previous enmity. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

1/4

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that due to previous enmity, in a wordy quarrel, the petitioners along with other accused had assaulted the defacto complainant and caused injury and destroyed the house hold articles. He further submitted that "the injured" has been discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions of both sides and also of the fact that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kancheepuram, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the 2/4

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate / Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate / Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

[e] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of the B.N.S 25.10.2024 vrc 3/4

P.DHANABAL, J.

vrc 25.10.2024 4/4