M/S Eagle Apparels Llp v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.12.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.29 and 30 of 2017 M/s.Eagle Apparel LLP, 47 & 8, T.V.K.Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

PAN: AAACE 1453E ... Appellant/Respondent in both appeals Vs.

The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(1), Chennai.

... Respondent/Appellant in bothe Appeal Tax Case (Appeal) filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai, dated 18.8.2016 made in ITA No.817/Mds/2016 and C.O.No.70/Mds/2016 preferred against order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-6 Chennai, in ITA.No. 147/2015-16 dated 28.01.2016 filed against the Assesment Officer, Corporate Ward - 2 (1), Chennai 34 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year 2012-13.

For Appellant : Mr.M.P.Senthilkumar For Respondent : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, Senior Standing Counsel

JUDGMENT

(Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J) Learned counsel Mr.M.P.Senthilkumar has submitted that the Assessee has approached the Department for settlement of the dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 and therefore, sought for permission of the court to withdraw the present Tax Case Appeals.

2. The learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr.Karthik Ranganathan appearing for the Respondent/Revenue has no objection for the same.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Accordingly, the Tax Case Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssk.

To 1.Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai.

2.The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(1), Chennai.

3.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Coimbatore.

+2cc to Mr.Philip George, Advocate, S.R.No. 42402, 42403 T.C.(A) Nos.29 & 30/2017 RSI(CO) GN(18/01/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/