Periasamy v. S.Manickam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Ninth day of April Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN CMP No.14221 of 2017 in AS No.373 of 2017 PERIASAMY [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 S.MANICKAM [ RESPONDENTS ] 2 DEEPALAKSHMI Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to stay all further proceedings in judgement and decree dt 29/04/2017 made in OS NO 51/2015 on the file of the III Additional District Judge Salem pending AS No.373 of 2017. Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.V.T.GOPALAN SENIOR COUNSEL for M/S.K.MOORTHY, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.

VIJAYAKUMAR Advocate for the 1st respondent and of M/S.ZEENATH BEGUM Advocate for the 2nd respondent the court made the following order:- On a prima facie consideration, this court was pleased to grant status quo. Inas much as the issues are to be dealt with only in the appeal complied with the fact that petitioner/appellant is said to have paid substantial amount interim order already granted is made absolute.

-sd/- 09/04/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE THIRD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SALEM.

+2 C.C. to M/S.K.MOORTHY Advocate SR.NO.5061 Order in CMP.14221/2017 in AS.373/2017 Date :09/04/2019 From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format VS 05.09.2017 VS 15.04.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/