Aravindgoshe v. State Rep.By

Crl.O.P.No.25617 of 2023 Crl.O.P.No.25617 of 2023 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

The petitioner is A9 in Crime No.524 of 2023, registered by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 302 and 120B IPC r/w Section 3 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908. 2.This Court had granted bail to A12, A13 and A14 but had dismissed the application seeking bail for A8. 3.The brief facts of the case according to the prosecution is that, the deceased and A4 had political and other business rivalry. The deceased originally had a contract with the Company run by A12. Subsequently, the said contract was cancelled and the same was given to A4.

4.In view of that particular fact, there was a further enmity and it is stated that A4 had organized contract killers to murder the deceased. The role of this petitioner is that subsequent to the offence of murder, he had sheltered the assailants, after receiving a sum of Rs.10,000/- for such expenses.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.25617 of 2023 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

ata 5.It is thus seen that he can be taken as one of the members of the said contract killers. In view of that particular fact though the learned counsel for the petitioner states that there is no previous case against the petitioner and that he is a college going student, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

08.11.2023 ata Crl.O.P.No.25617 of 2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis