Mubeena v. State Rep By

CRL.O.P.No.30642 of 2022 CRL.O.P.No.30642 of 2022 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 380 & 457 of IPC in Cr.No.348 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is A2, wife of A1. A1-husband of the petitioner break open the lock and trespassed into the defacto complainant's house and committed theft of gold jewels weighing 30gms and silver anklets 1 pair and cash Rs.60,000/- from the bureau. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that based on the confession statement this petitioner has been implicated in this case. Hence prays for grant of anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL.O.P.No.30642 of 2022 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

dpq that it is a case of robbery and the petitioner is the wife of A1. As per the confession statement of A1 he has stated that the stolen properties were handed over to his wife the petitioner herein. Till date the stolen properties were not recovered. He further submitted that the A1/husband of the petitioner is having seven previous case and this petitioner had absconded and the investigation is pending. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the gravity of offence committed by the petitioner, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 14.12.2022 dpq CRL.O.P.No.30642 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis