Ramya Ramamoorthy v. Mrs. Indira Vaidyanathan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 25.03.2025 CORAM :

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU C.S.No.284 of 2024 & A.No.6429 of 2024 & OA.Nos.945 & 946 of 2024 Mrs.Ramya Ramamoorthy ... Plaintiff vs.

Mrs.Indira Vaidyanathan ... Defendant Prayer : Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC to pray the following reliefs:- (i) Declaring that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of half share in the property described in Schedule-A to Plaint on the demise of her husband and the remaining half share after the life time of the Defendant as per the terms of the Settlement Deed, dated 13.06.2013, registered as Doc.No.5897 of 2013 S.R.O., Saidapet.

(ii) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, her men, agents, servants or any other person acting under her or authorized by her from taking any coercive action against the plaintiff, demanding share out of the properties left behind by the plaintiff's husband described in the Schedule-B hereunder. (iii) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, her men, agents, or any other person acting on her behalf from encumbering, alienating or dealing with the property described in the Schedule-A to the plaint. 1/5

(iv) for a mandatory injunction directing the defendant to handover the original title deeds including the Settlement Deed, dated 13.06.2013 registered as Doc.No.5897 of 2013 S.R.O., Saidapet relating to the property described in the Schedule-A to the Plaint to the plaint.

(v) For a declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the property described in Schedule-C to the plaintiff; (vi) For cost of the suit;

(vii) For such further other reliefs.

For Plaintiff : Mr.C.Ramesh For defendants : Mr.S.R.Raghunathan

J U D G M E N T

This suit has been filed for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction to not to take coercive action and not to alienate the suit schedule property as against the defendants.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, a Joint Memorandum of Compromise was filed before this Court indicating that the parties have settled the dispute among themselves. The same has been acknowledged by the learned counsel appearing for both the parties.

3. In view of the Compromise that had been arrived at between the parties on the terms of Joint Memorandum of Compromise, the suit is disposed 2/5

of in the terms of Joint Memorandum of Compromise. The said terms of Memorandum of Compromise is also annexed to this judgment. 4.Registry is directed to refund the court fee paid by the plaintiff. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications are closed.

25.03.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet :Yes / No Gba 3/5

K.KUMARESH BABU.J., Gba C.S.No.284 of 2024 & A.No.6429 of 2024 & OA.Nos.945 & 946 of 2024 25.03.2025 4/5

(2/2) 5/5