Indhirani v. P.Senthilkumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eleventh day of December Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R. MAHADEVAN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.18332 & 18334 of 2019 in CRL.R.C.NO.1402 of 2019 INDHIRANI [ PETITIONER ] Vs P.SENTHILKUMAR [ RESPONDENT ] Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to (i) To suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by the judgment dated 08.04.2019 passed in C.A.No.36/2019 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Erode confirming the judgment dated 05.01.2019 passed in S.T.C.No.468/2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court (Fast Track court No.II) Erode, Pending disposal of the above Crl.R.C.No.1402/2019. (Crl.M.P.No.

18332/2019) (ii) To exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the court below at present in pusuant to the judgment dated 08.04.2019 passed in C.A.No.36/2019 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Erode confirming the judgment dated 05.01.2019 passed in S.T.C.No.468/2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court (Fast Track court No.II) Erode, and convicted the appellant and sentenced him to undergo one year S.I. And to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in d/f to undergo three months S.I. Pending disposal of the above Crl.R.C.No.1402/2019. (Crl.M.P.No.18334/2019) Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.I.C.VASUDEVAN, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:- By judgment, dated 05.01.

2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.2, Erode, in S.T.C.No.

compensation of Rs.5,000/- to the complainant, failing which, she shall undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of three months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the petitioner preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.36 of 2019 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Erode, in which, the order of conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court was confirmed. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner filed the Criminal Revision Case along with the present Miscellaneous Petitions seeking suspension of sentence and exemption from surrendering before the trial Court, pending disposal of this Criminal Revision.

2.According to the learned counsel for the Petitioner, there are copious materials on record to prove that there is no legally enforceable debt and the petitioner has rebutted the presumption contemplated under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The learned counsel further submitted that there are arguable points available in the Criminal Revision Case, which is not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future and hence, the substantive sentence imposed against the petitioner may be suspended and the petitioner may be exempted from surrendering before the Trial Court.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also perused the materials placed on record.

4.At this juncture, it is relevant to point out that the Supreme Court, in Bihari Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar and another [2000 SCC (Crl) 1380], was of the view that while seeking the relief of suspension of sentence, the accused need not necessarily be under confinement. In Ibrahim v. State of Kerala [1979 KLT 857], it was held that for grant of suspension of sentence, the accused need not surrender and undergo confinement and filing revision without surrendering and confinement is well within the powers contemplated under Section 397(1)Cr.P.C, as the said provision itself is very unequivocal and unambiguous.

5.In the light of the aforesaid legal propositions and considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone can be suspended subject to certain conditions. Accordingly, till the disposal of the Criminal Revision Case, the reliefs of exemption from surrender before the Trial Court, suspension of sentence and bail are granted, on the following conditions:- a) The Petitioner/Accused shall deposit 50% of the cheque amount viz., Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) before the Trial Court, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

b) On such deposit being made, the Trial Court shall redeposit the said amount in a fixed deposit account in any nationalized bank. The disbursal of this amount shall be decided at the culmination of the Criminal Revision Case.

c) Thereafter, the Petitioner/Accused is ordered to be released on bail, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of whom, one should be a blood relative, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.2, Erode;

d) The Petitioner/Accused and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impressions in the surety bonds and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar Cards or Bank Pass Books to ensure their identities. e) The Petitioner/Accused shall appear before the Trial Court at 10.30a.m. on the first working day of every month, until the disposal of the revision case and if she is not able to appear before the Trial Court on any day, due to unavoidable circumstances, she shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 of Cr.PC. and shall appear before the Trial Court on any other day in lieu of her absence, as directed by the Trial Court. Such an application shall not be entertained often.

f) On the failure of the Petitioner/Accused, depositing the said amount, it is open to the Trial Court to commit the Petitioner/ Accused into custody for undergoing the sentence.

Post the matter on 10.01.2020 for reporting compliance. -sd/- 11/12/2019 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FAST TRACK COURT NO.2, ERODE.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ERODE. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, ERODE.

+1 C.C. to M/S.I.C.VASUDEVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.25663 Order in CRL MP.18332 & 18334/2019 in CRL.R.C.NO.1402/2019 Date :11/12/2019 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format TA-16/12/2019